The editorial
published on the website of the newspaper "The New York Times” on November
1, 2012 is headlined “As Wolves’ Numbers Rise, So Does Friction BetweenGuardians and Hunters’’. The author (STEVEN YACCINO) gives us
some details about the situation in the United States. The article touches upon
the fact that Ms. Dowler cares for five
full-grown purebreds. She bottle-fed them as pups and howls with them at
passing sirens. The other day she gave one breath mints through a hole in the
fence, passing it directly from her lips to his.
It was revealed
that Hers seems a fairy tale world
compared with the legal dogfights occurring beyond these kennels. Out there,
Wisconsin is three weeks into its first wolf-hunting season, sanctioned by the
State Legislature in April. Minnesota is scheduled to begin its first
registered wolf hunt this weekend.Moreover, the legalization of wolf hunting in
both states was devised to manage a rebounding wolf population after the
federal government stopped listing the species as endangered in the region last
year. Both have drawn lawsuits from local and national animal rights groups
that fear the undoing of nearly four decades of work to restore a healthy
number of wolves.
The article carries a lot of comment on the
fact that since the wolf hunt began last month, at least 42 have been killed in
Wisconsin. All told, officials expect 600 wolves will die at the hands of
hunters and trappers in the two states before spring. Wolves were once so numerous in the United States that ranchers and
government agencies paid people to kill them. By the time the Endangered
Species Act began protecting wolves in 1973, they were nearing extinction in
the lower 48 states. Today, wolf numbers have grown to 4,000 and exceeded
recovery goals in the western Great Lakes area, according to federal estimates.
In addition,
Wisconsin humane groups have filed a lawsuit to prohibit the use of dogs for
hunting wolves, calling it cruel. Minnesota advocates also took legal action
against their state in an attempt to stop its hunt, which lasts from Nov. 3 to
Jan. 31. And Minnesota’s Chippewa tribes have banned wolf hunting and trapping
on its reservation lands.
The main purpose of the article is to give the
reader some information about animal
rights groups have little sympathy for the hunters. They argue that the state
kill quotas do not properly account for other ways that wolves can die, like
poaching and vehicular collisions and the killing of the animals by farmers and
ranchers protecting their livestock. Those additional causes, they say, could
put the animals at risk again.
Analyzing the situation in the word it is
necessary to emphasize that people absolutely love wolves or they absolutely hate them. There are few
people in the middle.
So many animals are now in danger of extinction that a list is kept in a Red
Book. unfortunately, the list gets longer every year.We should do something, we
can’t wait. We mustn’t wait!
Excellent!
ОтветитьУдалитьSlips: about animal rights groups havING little sympathy for the hunters.